nerdnik wrote:
gapprncess wrote:It most certainly is still a violation of her privacy. I stand behind my belief. It's more about this law in general than this specific instance. Like I said, why is that companies/agencies/corporations/whatever require a signed photo release before they can publish your image, but the same rule doesn't apply for celebrities? That's fucked up.
Violated privacy?? You were hanging out a window and sunbathing on a boat in the middle of god knows where.
I understand the point you're trying to make, but at the same time, if her primary concern was invasion of privacy, there are instances where common sense should prevail. Fact: given that she was in a country with lax paparazzi laws (this is Italy, not France), standing on a hotel terrace topless wasn't the smartest idea. Fact: Repeating the bad judgment by being out in open water (not even the shield of plants this time) in said country. Fact: Recognizing, yet ignoring her propensity for this kind of behavior being published in the past. Summation: I think you would sing a different tune if she were standing in the middle of Times Square topless, someone photographed it and she took issue with that. There's no getting around the fact that when you're a celebrity in an area also highly populated with other celebs and there are paparrazzi, you should exercise better judgment.
i have no idea why but this made me laugh
