i really hope this bitch isn't trying to collect even more payment for these kids, after she's already been paid off!!
Debbie Rowe is a money hungry bitch(new ok magazine article)
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 franknbeans82 |
|||
|
Posts: 31066 (07/08/2009 9:27 AM) |
|
||
|
Rileyj26 |
|||
|
Posts: 8564 (07/08/2009 9:33 AM) |
Maybe she realizes the bullshit that Joe is going to cause them...with Michael they were shielded from that...now they are in the line of fire. I am sure she
knows private details we don't regarding Joe's abuse.
|
||
|
Tigerjag |
|||
|
Posts: 195 (07/08/2009 9:44 AM) |
Rileyj26 wrote:I agree with you about the kids being around Joe. I think that's a bad idea. On the other hand, I'm not sure that Debbie Rowe is all that stable either. Yes, it could be that she gave up her kids because Michael was more powerful, but she's said some things that make me think that those kids were a meal ticket and nothing more. I think she saw she could be set for life when she befriended Michael in the clinic. There would have been some clue before now that she was being kept away from the kids against her will. From what I understand, she was given some visitation rights that she never took advantage of. |
||
|
JellyRoll2 |
|||
|
Posts: 16522 (07/08/2009 9:48 AM) |
Joe, scumbag that he is, hasn't pimped out any of his other grandchildren. He's got their parents to go through now. I understand the concern about
Joe. I think most people have that concern. But Katherine and Joe don't even live in the same house 90% of the time. And I'm sure when Michael decided
to make her their guardian, his father's proximity to his kids was something he took into consideration.
If it's a choice between a woman who's a virtual stranger and has given up her rights and custody of her children twice for a big fat check vs. a grandmother and a ton of aunts and uncles who know and love these kids and can serve as a blockade to Joe possibly trying to sell these kids out, I'll take door B. |
||
|
Rileyj26 |
|||
|
Posts: 8567 (07/08/2009 9:48 AM) |
Perhaps...but maybe she didn't feel welcomed...honestly none of us know. But maybe now since she sees Michael can't protect them she wants to step in
and protect them...I can't see any harm in that. People change...HELL I even want to take them away from Joe and I don't even know them.
|
||
 vanessa bauer |
|||
|
Posts: 5501 (07/08/2009 9:48 AM) |
Just because its in OK magazine does not make it true. They are the worst source for information ever.
|
||
|
Rileyj26 |
|||
|
Posts: 8569 (07/08/2009 9:50 AM) |
That is true...they hardly get anything right.
|
||
|
funmi20 |
|||
|
Posts: 289 (07/08/2009 10:07 AM) |
where are people coming up with this stuff about the fact mj mother has them means they would be close to joe? joe and Katherine Jackson dont even live in the
same city talk less of the same house, i bet the time the kids would come into contact with him are at big family gatherings.
and for all we can say about joe he is still their grandfather and probably the only grandfather they know all their lives; they dont even know who debbie is i dont have a problem with debbie if she wants to visit or have visitation rights, where i have a problem is her wanting full custody and taking those kids away from their only family and their little brother. |
||
|
NancyOttawa |
|||
|
Posts: 6617 (07/08/2009 10:13 AM) |
What the heck has Joe got to do with any of this? He doesn't even live with Katharine anymore. They separated years ago although never divorced. He lives
in Las Vegas. I don't understand why people continue to bring him into this. I doubt Michael would have left his kids in his mother's care if he
thought Joe would be anywhere around them.
|
||
|
beverlyhills |
|||
|
Posts: 58 (07/08/2009 10:36 AM) |
Having Katherine is also having aunt Janet,uncles, cousins,etc. etc.
Edited By: beverlyhills
07/08/2009 10:42 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
funmi20 |
|||
|
Posts: 290 (07/08/2009 10:38 AM) |
NancyOttawa wrote: i agree with you... i think the only reason can see is that some people esp those that want Debbie to get the kids is because they use Joe as a stumbling block to Katharine getting the kids Michael isn't stupid, he knows his parents living situation am more than any of us, he knows that Joe and Katharine don't even live in the same house so i doubt he would live his kids in the care of his mother if his father was going to be part of their daily life after what he went through with the man. from what i understand Joe Jackson lives in Vegas with his other family, i presume the reason why him and Katharine haven't had a divorce is due to Katharine very religious background; as a strong Jehovah witness i think divorce is frowned upon
Edited By: funmi20
07/08/2009 10:43 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
PENNYFOURYOURTHOUGHTS |
|||
|
Posts: 951 (07/08/2009 10:44 AM) |
Ugh, if she somehow gets those kids, holy shit.....
Bitch needs to GTFO |
||
|
jeepchic20 |
|||
|
Posts: 15473 (07/08/2009 11:00 AM) |
NancyOttawa wrote:Exactly. They may possibly see Joe living with Katherine just as many times as they have when they lived with their dad. |
||
|
funmi20 |
|||
|
Posts: 291 (07/08/2009 11:04 AM) |
Lets Hug It Out wrote:And isnt what best for the kids means staying with the rest of their extended family and the only family they have know all their lives after the loss of their father rather than being shipped off to a strange woman just because they share DNA . Also as Debbie was clearly just a surrogate i doubt her and Michael didn't have a payment plan for her services from the beginning, she was paid to give him the kids he wanted and she took the offer even coming back for second rounds; i think that says a lot about her lets look at this situation using another celebrity like Madonna: lets say she was in this situation(i hope she still have a long live to go) and when she dies lives custody of her kids to family members but David and mercy fathers decided to fight to have them back, would people saying oh yeah they share DNA with theses people so they should be taken back to them rather than Madonna family who they have know as their only family?
Edited By: funmi20
07/08/2009 11:08 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
Sue1811 |
|||
|
Posts: 15138 (07/08/2009 11:16 AM) |
Debbie Rowe gives me a bad vibe. Obviously no one knows what happened behind closed doors but she was paid off twice. If she loved her children that much and
wanted to be apart of their lives she should of fought harder to be in their lives, and not give in to money.
I don't have children(but I would like too one day) but if I ever do I can't imagine giving them up for money. If it were me I would scratch, clawed, and beat the crap out of anyone who would get in the way of me being a part of my kids lives, but thats just me. What kind of mother would do something like that, and then want them back after all this time.
Edited By: Sue1811
07/08/2009 11:29 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
Kwis77 |
|||
|
Posts: 18084 (07/08/2009 11:45 AM) |
funmi20 wrote: 
|
||
|
NancyOttawa |
|||
|
Posts: 6620 (07/08/2009 11:51 AM) |
Lets Hug It Out wrote:I do NOT agree with the first part of this sentence but I DO agree with the last part. I'm sorry, but I totally believe that she was in it for the money from the very beginning. There was probably a contract drawn up and signed, sealed, and delivered before she was even impregnated that stated how much money she was to get and how this would all play out. Their breif marriage and family photos was all just a sham so the public would believe that they had a legitimate marriage, and legitimate children from both of them biologically. |
||
|
doylefan2002 |
|||
|
Posts: 9840 (07/08/2009 12:06 PM) |
She's not a mother--it was just a business deal all around.
|
||
|
britandjfan81 |
|||
|
Posts: 496 (07/08/2009 12:10 PM) |
This woman is working my last nerve.
And I'm sorry but if she thinks that those kids will be more protected with her, she's delusional. Paparazzi started following her as soon as MJ died. They would be exposed with her, the Jackson at least could afford to provide protection and shield them. On a happier note... Michael really seemed to like calling people apple head. There was an interview back form 2001 whe he did that big concert where Britney said he called her that 
|
||
|
JellyRoll2 |
|||
|
Posts: 16535 (07/08/2009 12:14 PM) |
Kwis77 wrote: Aww!  And see, this goes with the point we were making about Mike's�voice not being as high pitched as always thought.
�� |
||
