Yuku free message boards

Copy323 wrote:

---

MissDivaDoll wrote:

---

99thdegree wrote:

---

I believe it at this point. Everyone is calling her trashy and a ho and maybe she is.. but he seems like a scumbag and a half. Its pretty hard to pass a polygraph test and I doubt she was smart enough to text herself from a Beverly Hills number weeks before to set this up.

No it's not. Putting a tack in your shoe and poking yourself right when you answer, and pushing like you're trying to fart are easy and common techniques. Not to mention that actors and pathological liars are pretty damn good at passing them too. It's not as hard to pass as people think.

What? I've had three polygraphs and failed two of them. I didn't do a single thing wrong and I still failed. They are very hard to pass. I know lots of people that failed three and four, also not guilty of anything at all. I'm speaking of polygraphs required for my job in the Air Force and access to secure facilities, so I'd imagine if you truly are guilty of something (cheating or a crime), it would be that much harder to pass.

Why should you learn how people beat a lie detector test? Imagine there is a theft at work, and you are among the suspects. You know you are innocent, so you agree to take a polygraph test. The polygraph operator explained that you have nothing to worry about if you are innocent. But then, the day of the test, he mentions that the test is 90% accurate. That seems pretty good - for about a second!

Hey! That means some innocent people fail the test, you suddenly realize. That isn't a very nice thought. You agreed to take the test, however, and it sure will look suspicious if you change your mind now, so you let the questioning begin. In any case, you're still likely to be in the 90% of innocent people who pass the test, right?

Wrong! It isn't a matter of just passing or failing. There are the "inconclusive" tests as well. Polygraph examiners measure accuracy by dividing the number of correct results by the total number of "pass" and "fail" results. "Inconclusive" results are not used in the figuring, and may be as high as 50%. In other words, if a hundred innocent people take the test, 5 are likely to fail and 45 pass (45 divided by 50 equals 90% "accuracy"). Meanwhile (in this example) there will be 50 for whom the results are "inconclusive."

In this case, 55 of 100 innocent people will either be labeled incorrectly as lying or inconclusively as "perhaps lying." And you think you have nothing to worry about if you're innocent? You don't even have a 50% chance of being cleared by the test!

Junk Science

Most scientists think that the polygraph is not based on science. Even former CIA Director R. James Woolsey says, "...the use of this highly flawed instrument should be radically curtailed." It is not a lie detector, it is not science, and you are gambling with your reputation when you agree to it.

shatha777 wrote:

---

kandii wrote:

---

AudaciousAudrey wrote:

---

kandii wrote:

---

Oh and a person who can dance nude and control her emotions, or someone dellusional who believes their own lies can pass a polygraph.

lol what? You're comparing all strippers to pathological liars and sociopaths? I don't really think that's fair.

NO any profession that requires control of a person's emotions makes it easier IF someone is a liar to pass a lie detector test NO way am I saying all strippers are liars. I think it's an ok profession, and good strippers are able to make a decent living and are discrete. This stripper happens to be contradicting herself and looks like a liar. Actors, or others who also control their emotions probably would be good at passing these tests too, but not all are liars. That is why lie detector tests are not admissible in court.

ohh is she have emotions ?! her face is soo scary not comfortable face and she look old i give her between 55-60 year old ! when i saw her face and her look in inside edition i think she is
belong to Mafya not stripper .