How many pro life people are in this post?
If so, CAN YOU FUCKING READ?
If so, CAN YOU FUCKING READ?
I'm about to open a can of worms- to pro-choice people.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Tommy |
|||
|
Posts: 5196 (11/09/2009 9:33 PM) |
|
||
|
Jane Smith |
|||
|
Posts: 793 (11/09/2009 9:35 PM) |
Kimkim232 wrote:Yes. In cases of rape, incest or when the health of the mother is at risk it should even be a question. In other cases I think the medical costs for not covering abortions are far higher. If a woman wants to terminate a pregnancy she'll find a way whether it's with a coat hanger or douching with a toxic solution or another "at home" remedy. In such cases the odds of a woman becoming badly injured, or extremely ill are high. So are the costs of the emergency procedures that may be needed to save her. When you think of it that way it's far less expensive to cover it being done in a sterile clinic by a doctor who knows what s/he is doing. |
||
|
chelley0223 |
|||
|
Posts: 10815 (11/09/2009 9:39 PM) |
ugh rabies wrote:That's because in some ways, its like we never had the women's movement and got equal rights. Men are still catered to and women are put on the back burner. |
||
|
westcoaster |
|||
|
Posts: 3881 (11/09/2009 9:43 PM) |
Kisses4NSync wrote:It would cost us a lot more if only people with serious medical issues got treatment. Preventative care is significantly cheaper. That's why the insurance company I worked for put so much money into educating people to take better care of themselves and get regular treatment instead of waiting until it's a crisis. They certainly weren't doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. |
||
|
the lakes slave |
|||
|
Posts: 64607 (11/09/2009 9:43 PM) |
It doesn't really bother me that it's not currently covered, but I think that it's absurd that erectile dysfunction medications and similar are covered if abortions are not. I'd appreciate some consistency there. Well you're never gonna get consistency as long as men rule the world. Some dumbass Congressman said women should have to pay higher premiums on their insurance because they might get pregnant. 
BUT DON'T TAKE AWAY HIS VIAGRA! |
||
|
celebtrashwhore |
|||
|
Posts: 7737 (11/09/2009 9:43 PM) |
ugh rabies wrote: Seriously. And yes I think they should be covered. |
||
|
Butterflygal20 |
|||
|
Posts: 2357 (11/09/2009 9:51 PM) |
Yep it is a medical procedure and the choice of the women. Curious how can you pro-choice and not want to protect the right to choose? It is a medical
procedure, if this was a man there wouldnt even be a question. Their reproductive rights are always covered.
|
||
|
sweetgurrl452 |
|||
|
Posts: 13477 (11/09/2009 9:56 PM) |
Yes.
|
||
|
kellynn34 |
|||
|
Posts: 3665 (11/09/2009 9:57 PM) |
Birth Control should be covered. Abortions shouldn't be covered.
|
||
 VelvetRope11 |
|||
|
Posts: 32543 (11/09/2009 10:00 PM) |
I'm with others. Birth Control should be covered, as well as medically necessary abortions for the health of the mother (rape falls under this in my
opinion, if the mother chooses.) If you're just someone who slipped up and needs an abortion, out of pocket expense.
|
||
|
daisy bouquet |
|||
|
Posts: 1800 (11/09/2009 10:00 PM) |
If fertility treatments are going to be covered,so should abortions.
|
||
|
zerabrum |
|||
|
Posts: 2437 (11/09/2009 10:10 PM) |
Word2YAmutha wrote: |
||
|
dogfoot75 |
|||
|
Posts: 1159 (11/09/2009 10:22 PM) |
joey is a teapot wrote:This. Also, BC should be fully covered. And I'm pro- life and can read. It's just... it's a legal, medical procedure, so why shouldn't it be covered? The fact that I don't agree with the procedure means nothing in this context. |
||
|
orangepeel19 |
|||
|
Posts: 15827 (11/09/2009 10:24 PM) Friendliest JJBer '09
|
I think it should be covered, yes.
|
||
|
merchasa |
|||
|
Posts: 2561 (11/09/2009 11:31 PM) |
Sometimes I think pro lifers who take birth control pills are sadly ignorant over how those pills work.
You can actually get pregnant while taking the pill; however the pill makes it so the lining of the uterus will reject the embryo and spontaneously abort it. Just so you know. It happens quite often and you never know about it. |
||
|
ScarletOWhora85 |
|||
|
Posts: 17134 (11/10/2009 12:04 AM) |
SwanGeese wrote: |
||
|
yvettemarie21 |
|||
|
Posts: 24017 (11/10/2009 12:11 AM) |
merchasa wrote:Doesn't it just keep the fertilized egg from attaching itself to the lining...which also happens quite often (without the pill)? |
||
|
ILUVBubbleGUM |
|||
|
Posts: 1245 (11/10/2009 12:17 AM) |
I think like any medical procedure, it should be covered by insurance. I mean I know plenty of people who even get plastic surgery covered by insurance. And
you are paying for this insurance anyway so why the freak not. lol
|
||
|
maifanluva00 |
|||
|
Posts: 6236 (11/10/2009 12:18 AM) |
yep.
|
||
|
Pier49.niketalk |
|||
|
Posts: 260 (11/10/2009 12:18 AM) |
Lets Hug It Out wrote: |
||
